Thank you Josh for a straight shooting Disaffected podcast tonight! Your courage to tackle the shibboleths of the woke arbiters of our society are much needed and greatly appreciated!
There were many out here, who like you were screaming that the drag queen story hour's emergence on the scene was the harbinger and intentionally placed spring board, for the main streaming of pedophilia.
Many misunderstood that statement at the time and still do. How I do not know.
I always explain that the surface perversions, have a few specific purposes:
1. They counter intuitively, are the top and unavoidably conspicuous. It's the extreme, clownish, shoves of the Overton Window, that people usually scoff at, discount and eventually go nose blind to. People will remember the first mention of the Green New Deal, presented by the clown AOC, was scoffed at, derided, and dismissed out of hand. It became the inflation reduction act.
2. They introduce hyper sexualization, directly to the target audience - the children. Remember this statement.
3. It was a rallying cry to the closeted perverts/pedos, that were always lurking in your and your children's midst, to prepare and organize, because the infrastructure, protection and legislative/celeb support was now in place. They now had a strategic vehicle for moving these groomers, "benignly" out into the open and to acceptance by parents, educators and legislators.
4. They captured a large cohort of adults - Some were easily netted, due to being liberal/progressive/globalist/woke. Others were captured because they were pre-groomed to be - They are the adults, that were groomed as children (ideologically, societally or sexually), to accept this.
Usually people get those 4 items. However, what is lost on them is, we (adults) were never the real targets. The 2, 3, 5, and 10 year old's always were. Well no duh...right?
Ok, yes, the child molestation would fit into that statement - what clearer target for a pedo could there be?
The more important reason - yes more important - to those working the mainstreaming/normalization operation, is to strip very young children of any loosly anchored, budding normative markers where sex/gender (there are only boys and girls), morals (grown up don't touch me in my privates or show me theirs), society (we call Mr. jones, Ms. Jenna or she/her, they them) are concerned. An unmoored boat, will drift anywhere an underlying current takes it.
A child who lives this altered, perverse reality each day, will grow into an adult that not only see's these things as normal, but is GROOMED to see even more perverse and debauched ideologies and agendas as acceptable.
This is how you engineer a society, where there are no guard rails, no morality, no limits - you do it one 2, 3, 5 or 10 year old, at a time.
Josh of your best shows. Not only do these people in your state of VT enable the whole MAPS they will go to the polls this fall and elect local and national politicians that will foster the move towards legalizing and moralizing sexual acts between children and adults. Particularly a Harris/Walz Administration. This is what the "trans" movement is really about. It's a means to an end goal in which MAPS will be considered not only a protected entity but a celebrated entity as well.
There are no words to adequately describe the absolute evil at the core of the whole woke movement. They are despicable depraved parasites and totally beneath contempt !! Thanks ,Josh. Keep exposing this humanity destroying ,child mutilating cult ,the most evil and dangerous in history !! xx
I feel like when we use language like “kiddie fiddler” or “kiddie fucker” it actually serves to deaden some of the shock and outrage of speaking or hearing of these people—ironically in much the same way that “minor-attracted person” attempts to consciously do so. “Child fucker,” “child molester,” “child sexual abuser,” “child-attracted pedophile” are more jarring, and I think necessarily so. I’d be curious if you might generally agree. Obviously we want insulting and pejorative language in the quiver to loose at them when speaking TO them—and whatever stings the most. But when speaking OF them, I think the conversation is disserved by using language that is in any way euphemistic or softened such as “kiddie”.
Facetious follow-up, if by using more descriptive and jarring language we can better communicate an intuitive grotesquery of concepts, maybe we can get through to liberal women by calling pedophiles “kiddo sexual abusers.” If nothing else, maybe we can pollute the term “kiddo” sufficiently to have liberal women stop using it… A guy can dream…
Hell, our city council pays for drag queen summer camps for ages 7 and up. 🤮
Thank you Josh for a straight shooting Disaffected podcast tonight! Your courage to tackle the shibboleths of the woke arbiters of our society are much needed and greatly appreciated!
Excellent again Josh.
There were many out here, who like you were screaming that the drag queen story hour's emergence on the scene was the harbinger and intentionally placed spring board, for the main streaming of pedophilia.
Many misunderstood that statement at the time and still do. How I do not know.
I always explain that the surface perversions, have a few specific purposes:
1. They counter intuitively, are the top and unavoidably conspicuous. It's the extreme, clownish, shoves of the Overton Window, that people usually scoff at, discount and eventually go nose blind to. People will remember the first mention of the Green New Deal, presented by the clown AOC, was scoffed at, derided, and dismissed out of hand. It became the inflation reduction act.
2. They introduce hyper sexualization, directly to the target audience - the children. Remember this statement.
3. It was a rallying cry to the closeted perverts/pedos, that were always lurking in your and your children's midst, to prepare and organize, because the infrastructure, protection and legislative/celeb support was now in place. They now had a strategic vehicle for moving these groomers, "benignly" out into the open and to acceptance by parents, educators and legislators.
4. They captured a large cohort of adults - Some were easily netted, due to being liberal/progressive/globalist/woke. Others were captured because they were pre-groomed to be - They are the adults, that were groomed as children (ideologically, societally or sexually), to accept this.
Usually people get those 4 items. However, what is lost on them is, we (adults) were never the real targets. The 2, 3, 5, and 10 year old's always were. Well no duh...right?
Ok, yes, the child molestation would fit into that statement - what clearer target for a pedo could there be?
The more important reason - yes more important - to those working the mainstreaming/normalization operation, is to strip very young children of any loosly anchored, budding normative markers where sex/gender (there are only boys and girls), morals (grown up don't touch me in my privates or show me theirs), society (we call Mr. jones, Ms. Jenna or she/her, they them) are concerned. An unmoored boat, will drift anywhere an underlying current takes it.
A child who lives this altered, perverse reality each day, will grow into an adult that not only see's these things as normal, but is GROOMED to see even more perverse and debauched ideologies and agendas as acceptable.
This is how you engineer a society, where there are no guard rails, no morality, no limits - you do it one 2, 3, 5 or 10 year old, at a time.
Josh of your best shows. Not only do these people in your state of VT enable the whole MAPS they will go to the polls this fall and elect local and national politicians that will foster the move towards legalizing and moralizing sexual acts between children and adults. Particularly a Harris/Walz Administration. This is what the "trans" movement is really about. It's a means to an end goal in which MAPS will be considered not only a protected entity but a celebrated entity as well.
There are no words to adequately describe the absolute evil at the core of the whole woke movement. They are despicable depraved parasites and totally beneath contempt !! Thanks ,Josh. Keep exposing this humanity destroying ,child mutilating cult ,the most evil and dangerous in history !! xx
IDK, seems kind of like a good opportunity to get a bunch of them in the same place....
I feel like when we use language like “kiddie fiddler” or “kiddie fucker” it actually serves to deaden some of the shock and outrage of speaking or hearing of these people—ironically in much the same way that “minor-attracted person” attempts to consciously do so. “Child fucker,” “child molester,” “child sexual abuser,” “child-attracted pedophile” are more jarring, and I think necessarily so. I’d be curious if you might generally agree. Obviously we want insulting and pejorative language in the quiver to loose at them when speaking TO them—and whatever stings the most. But when speaking OF them, I think the conversation is disserved by using language that is in any way euphemistic or softened such as “kiddie”.
Facetious follow-up, if by using more descriptive and jarring language we can better communicate an intuitive grotesquery of concepts, maybe we can get through to liberal women by calling pedophiles “kiddo sexual abusers.” If nothing else, maybe we can pollute the term “kiddo” sufficiently to have liberal women stop using it… A guy can dream…