9 Comments

An SJW wolf in conservative sheep's clothing.

Expand full comment
Mar 20, 2023Liked by Josh Slocum

"Just a few bad apples" 🙄

Expand full comment

In this case, "nutpicking" is an unfortunate choice of words. She probably did it deliberately. She's what my generation would call a "poser" and does not strike me as genuine about anything.

Expand full comment

She is a dangerous Poseur. From her cheese ball headshots to her attention seeking ideological endorsements. She reads as authentically as a knockoff, NYC, ChinaTown “designer” bag.

Expand full comment

I absolutely agree. I saw her tweet. She's a fool or she's posing as others have said.

Expand full comment

Extreme or not, they are all head cases that have been damaged at one time or another. God help them but moreover, may God shield the children from the clutches of those who would drag them into their hell.

Expand full comment
founding

Funny how those pictured look like almost 100% of nutcases I've seen portrayed in videos and TiKToK. I watched your show last night and everyone of the activists who spoke at that meeting look similar to that gallery of nutcases: intentionally unattractive. They are offensive in appearance, belief and behavior. Why? Because that's all they have going for them, and by God, they're going to make the most of it.

Expand full comment

I think she’s likely just an idiot who is too narcissistic to even comprehend the experience of other people. We’re NPCs she needs to defeat and nothing more. Obviously she’s oblivious to any real dangers because nothing bad has ever happened to her. She probably “loves all her trans friends dearly” and believes them when they claim they’re not autogynephiles. Dumbass.

She’s still the enemy. A stupid one, but still an enemy. These clueless virtue seekers will ruin all safeguards along with everything else with their narcissistic refusal to either show their work or listen to the people affected by their efforts to Nerf everything important and true into impotency, while ignoring the actual wolves circling outside. No inner sense of morality or danger, or at least not one they ever listen to.

She’s reminding me of the type of women who marry abusers then gain a weird sense of pride and superiority over their husband when he goes through the apologetic and shameful part of the abuse cycle. Women who ignore the immoral actions of their husbands, who smack their kids for lying when they tell them “Daddy/uncle Frank/Father Jones stuck his hand up my skirt.” They are abusive in their own right, as well as accomplices to the men they attach themselves to. Mermaids, the UK “transgender kids” org that’s in trouble for safeguarding issues, is just full of these types (in their case, the “abusive husband” appears to be paedophiles).

I hope she can pullout of this. In the meantime I wish she’d STFU. She’s NOT helping anyone except predators.

Expand full comment

This is the trans version of "that's not my feminism." The problem is that, even if that's true, it doesn't matter. It doesn't matter because the people who make the most noise and dominate the movements are EXACTLY like that. And if you ignore them without protest then--guess what?--it IS your feminism and it IS your trans movement because you were negligent and you let them run the show. YOU are responsible. Insulting people who out bad behavior by trans people by accusing them "nut picking" is just more passive/aggressive shooting of the messenger.

But if there's one thing female left-wing political activists are known for, it's demanding equality and respect on one hand while loading personal responsibility onto everybody else. Then it's spa time.

Expand full comment